Skip Navigation


DNA Research Advance Access originally published online on September 16, 2006
DNA Research 2006 13(3):103-109; doi:10.1093/dnares/dsl002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
13/3/103    most recent
dsl002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Kazusa DNA Research Institute
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Genomic Instability of the DYZ1 Repeat in Patients with Y Chromosome Anomalies and Males Exposed to Natural Background Radiation

Deepali Pathak, Sanjay Premi, Jyoti Srivastava, Sebastian Padinjarel Chandy and Sher Ali*

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Immunology Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 11 0067, India

Received 23 May 2006; revised 12 July 2006


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We assessed genomic instability of 3.4 kb DYZ1 repeat arrays in patients encompassing prostate cancer (PC), cases of repeated abortion (RA) and males exposed to natural background radiation (NBR) using real-time PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Normal males showed DYZ1 copies ranging from 3000 to 4300, RA, 0–2237; PC, 550; and males exposed to NBR, 1577–5700. FISH showed organizational variation of DYZ1 in these samples substantiating the data obtained from real-time PCR. Of the 10 RA samples, 7 were found to be affected of which, 5 showed deletion of 265 bp from nt 25 to 290 and 773 bp from 1347 to 2119 and 2 showed deletion of 275 bp from nt 3128 to 3402. Copy number variation of DYZ1 in these males correlated with genetic constrains/anomalies. Although precise mechanisms of genomic instability of DYZ1 remains unclear, we construe that this repeat plays a critical role in maintaining the structural integrity of the Y chromosome, possibly by absorbing the load of mutations. This may be used as a marker system to analyze genetic integrity of the DYZ1 repeat array(s) across the spectrum of patients.

Key words: copy number variation; DYZ1 repeat fraction; Y chromosome dysfunction; repeated abortion; prostate cancer


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The human Y chromosome has attracted a great deal of attention owing to its small size and the limited number of genes it carries.1Go,2Go The recent genomic data showed presence of massive palindromic sequences having several isoforms and multiple copies of genes suggesting its unique organization and equally unique trail of evolution.3Go–5Go Despite fewer functional genes located on the Y chromosome,6Go,7Go its earlier image of genetic wasteland is totally changed. Complete sequencing of the euchromatic region revealed a total of 178 transcribed units,3Go most of which are pseudogenes or their amplified copies. The Y encodes only 45 unique proteins and several of its genes are involved in sex determination and control and regulation of fertility.8Go,9Go

The human Y chromosome has been divided into pseudoautosomal regions (PAR1 and PAR2), which represent 5% of its total sequences, whereas the remaining 95% NRY (Non-Recombining Y) contains euchromatic and heterochromatic regions. The genes in the PAR1 and PAR2 regions are inherited like autosomal ones.10Go The distal region represents the heterochromatic portion corresponding to Yq12 with ~30 Mb sequences11Go and harbors two major repeat domains, DYZ1 and DYZ2.12Go The DYZ1 satellite, corresponding to ~40% of the total Y chromosome7Go was first reported as 3.4 kb band from HaeIII digested human male genomic DNA.13Go Sequence analysis of a single array uncovered 229 copies of pentanucleotide repeat motifs 5'-TTCCA-3'.14Go A normal human Y chromosome contains 2000–4000 copies of DYZ113Go in a sex-specific manner.15Go–17Go However, it is not clear if copy number variation of DYZ1 affects its normal functioning, if any, and correlates with spermatogenesis, male fertility, sustenance to full-term pregnancy or overall reproductive potential of the males. DYZ1 has been found to show mosaicism in repeated abortion (RA),18Go whereas other loci seem to be affected in prostate cancer (PC)19Go,20Go and males exposed to natural background radiation (NBR).21Go However, the changes that are brought about within the Y chromosome through the genomic instability of DYZ1 repeat fraction under these conditions remain unclear.

A reliable assay system for an accurate quantification of the copy number status of the DYZ1 array is not available. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) uncovered chromosomal translocation, mosaicism and aberrant Y chromosome17Go,18Go but failed to detect copy number status of the DYZ1 since probe detected single signal on the Yq12 region. Here we describe assessment of copy number variation of the DYZ1 arrays in normal males, patients suffering from PC, cases of RA and males exposed to NBR employing real-time PCR and FISH. Our work shows copy number status of the DYZ1 arrays in the normal males and patients and establishes a genotype phenotype correlation. Prospects of this work in the area of Y chromosome genomics in general and clinical genetics in particular are highlighted.


    2. Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
2.1. Collection of human blood and germline samples and isolation of DNA
Ten RA samples were obtained from Nobel hospital, Faridabad, North India, and two PC from Kerala, South India. A total of 56 samples containing 40 blood and 16 semen samples from males and 15 blood samples from females, all exposed to NBR were collected from Chavra, (Kerala) in accordance with the Institute's Ethical and Biosafety Committee. In addition, 20 blood samples from normal males and females each from North India were also used. DNA isolation was performed following standard protocols.22Go

2.2. PCR amplification of DYZ1 fraction
To assess organizational variation of DYZ1 repeats (accession no. X06228 [GenBank] ), both at its copy number level as well as within the single array amongst individuals suffering from RA, PC and exposed to NBR, internal primers were designed (Table 1) using Primer Express Software V2.0 (ABI). PCRs were conducted in a 25 µl volume containing Taq Polymerase, 10x PCR buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 200 µM dNTPs and 100 ng of target DNA for a total of 35 cycles. Each cycle involved denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing 60°C for 1.5 min and primer extension at 72°C for 1 min. The amplified products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gel. The quantity and quality of the above mentioned samples were confirmed by PCR amplification using a set of Human ß-actin (F 5'-GTGGGCCGCTCTAGACACCA-3' and R 5'-CGGTTGGCCTTAGG G TTCAGGGGGG-3') primers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Details of primers used for amplification of different regions of the DYZ1 repeat array

 
2.3. Slot–blot hybridization
In order to confirm deletions shown by endpoint PCR, 500 ng of genomic DNA from different RA samples in 100 µl of 2x SSC was slot blotted onto a nylon membrane (Manifold Apparatus, Schleicher & Schuell, Germany) and UV fixed. For control, genomic DNA from normal male and female was included in the blot. Independently amplified PCR products of 265, 773 and 275 bp from normal human male were used as probe. Hybridization and autoradiography was performed following standard procedure.23Go

2.4. FISH
For FISH with human metaphase chromosomes, DYZ1 cloned probe was labeled using Nick Translation Kit from Vysis (IL, USA) following supplier's instructions. Hybridization, washing, counter staining and mounting of the slides were performed following established protocol.17Go Slides were screened under the Olympus microscope (BX51) fitted with vertical fluorescence illuminator U-LH100HG UV, excitation and barrier filters. Images were captured with a CCD camera. For karyotyping, CytoVision 2.81 software from Applied Imaging was used.

2.5. Copy number calculation of DYZ1 repeat
The copy number of DYZ1 was calculated based on absolute quantification assay using SYBR green dye and Sequence Detection System-7000 (ABI, CA). A set of primers specific to DYZ1 (DYZ1F: 5'-TGGAATGGAATCGAATGGAATGGAA-3' and DYZ1R: 5'-TGCCAAATCATTGCATTCCTTTCC-3') was designed using Primer Express Software V2.0 (ABI). The efficiency of primers was assessed by using a 10-fold dilution series of the recombinant plasmid and standard male genomic DNA. The reactions were performed in triplicate using 96-well plates in a 25 µl reaction volume employing conditions of 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 1 min. Copies of the DYZ1 arrays were calculated by extrapolation of the standard curve obtained with known copies of the recombinant plasmid.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
3.1. Organizational variation within the DYZ1 region
Of all the samples used in the present study, nine showed distinct deletions within the DYZ1 arrays (Fig. 1a). Of these, a 265 bp deletion from nt 25 to 290 was detected in five (RA1, RA5, RA7, RA8 and RA10) individuals (Fig. 1b, panel A). A 775 bp deletion from nt 1347 to 2119 was detected in seven (RA1, RA6, RA7, RA8, RA9, NBRS6 and NBRS29) individuals (Fig. 1c and e, panel A). Another 275 bp deletion, spanning from nt 3128 to 3402 was detected in two (RA1 and RA8) individuals (Fig. 1d, panel A). Significantly, samples RA1 and RA8 showed all the three (265, 773 and 275 bp) deletions. However, all the samples showed amplification with ß-actin primer giving rise to expected 650 bp fragment indicating intactness of the target DNA (Fig. 1b–e, panels B). Screening of the DNA samples from normal men showed no deletion. Table 2 represents details of DNA samples and primers used for screening of the DYZ1 arrays.


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic representation showing three deletion points in the DYZ1 arrays (a), their corresponding individual deletions in RA (b–d) and germline and blood samples of NBR (e). As control, amplification with ß-actin primers is shown in panel B. Sample ID is given on top of each panel and molecular marker (M) is shown in base pairs.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Details of the DNA samples and primers used for the screening DYZ1 array(s)

 
3.2. Slot blot hybridization substantiates deletions in RA samples
Slot–blot analysis of the DNA from RA samples probed independently with 265, 773 and 275 bp fragments showed absence of signals in several individuals. RA1, RA5, RA7, RA8 and RA10 showed absence of signals when hybridized with labeled probe of 265 bp (Fig. 2a, panel A). Similarly, RA1, RA6, RA7, RA8 and RA9 showed no signal with labeled probe of 773 bp (Fig. 2b, panel A), and RA1 and RA8 with 275 bp (Fig. 2c, panel A). Hybridization of genomic DNA with ß-actin showed signals in all the samples (Fig. 2a–c, panel B).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Slot–blot hybridization of genomic DNA from RA with PCR amplified fragments of the DYZ1 arrays of: 265 bp (a); 773 bp (b) and 275 bp (c) from normal male (panel A) and ß-actin (panel B). Note the lack of signals in seven RA samples. NM and NF denote normal human male and female genomic DNA, respectively.

 
3.3. FISH uncovers DYZ1 (in)stability on the Y chromosome
FISH of DYZ1 with metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei of one RA, 24 individuals exposed to NBR and two PC, showed varying levels of signals. Of the two PCs, PC1 showed DYZ1 signal on the autosome 10 along with Y chromosome in ~80% metaphases, which was substantiated by three signals in the interphase nuclei (Fig. 3a and b). In addition, single DYZ1 signal was also detected in ~20% cells in PC1 indicating DYZ1 mosaicism. PC2 showed DYZ1 signal in ~40% cells and total absence of the same in the remaining 60% cells (Fig. 3c and d, arrows), indicating a gross level of DYZ1 mosaicism. The FISH analysis on sample RA10 showed overall reduced but varying signals of DYZ1 on the Y chromosome and interphase nuclei (Fig. 3e). Similar results showing variations in the DYZ1 signal intensity were obtained from the screening of 13 families exposed to NBR, where five males 1b, 3b, 8f, 9f and 13f showed relatively reduced signals (Fig. 3f). In addition, the 8b male showed positional change and 2f, 4f and 10f males showed enhanced signals of the DYZ1 arrays suggesting their organizational variations (Fig. 3f). Present study establishes a correlation between the specific genotype (PC, NBR and RA) and varying level of DYZ1 instability, reflected as presence/absence or reduced level of signals.


Figure 3
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Fluorescent in situ hybridization of DYZ1 arrays with human Y chromosome in males representing PC-1 (a–b) and PC-2 (c–d), RA10 (e) and 13 families of males exposed to NBR (f). Note the DYZ1 signal on autosome 10 and Y chromosome (a–b), absence of the same on the Y chromosome in panel d (arrow) and its unequal distribution (e–f).

 
3.4. Copy number status of DYZ1 in normal males, RA, PC and NBR
High quality intact DNA samples of all the categories were subjected to real-time PCR to assess copy number status of the DYZ1 arrays. The standard curve in real-time PCR with a slope of –3.4 and single dissociation peak reflected 100% efficiency of the assay system (data not shown). The primers were highly specific as evident from the females showing no amplification. In normal males, DYZ1 copies ranged from 3000 to 4300, in RA, 0 to 2237 and in NBR, 1577 to 5700. PC2 showed 550 copies of the DYZ1 arrays. The real-time PCR results were consistently reproducible as evident from the samples subjected to reactions at least for three times. Copy number status of the DYZ1 arrays amongst group of different samples is shown in a representative bar diagram (Fig. 4). Compared with DNA used as control from normal males, all the other samples, showed CNV of DYZ1 either below or above the normal range. Genomic instability of DYZ1 seems to be more common in RA samples compared with that in NBR exposed males.


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. A bar diagram showing copy number status of the DYZ1 arrays in representative RA, PC (a) and NBR samples (b). Note the variations amongst different RA and NBR samples.

 

    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
4.1. Organizational variation of the DYZ1 arrays
In the present study, our aim was to assess copy number status of the DYZ1 arrays in normal males and compare the same with that in patients representing PC, RA and NBR samples. DYZ1 represents a major satellite fraction of ~3.4 kb from the long arm of the human Y chromosome with overabundant STR motif 5'-TTCCA-3'.14Go STRs have been known to expand and shrink possibly owing to unequal cross-over during meiosis24Go giving rise to hypervariable regions25Go or variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) loci.26Go Sequences on the Y chromosome show rapid rate of evolution as opposed to that on the autosomes and X chromosomes and move equally rapidly in an intra-chromosomal and inter-chromosomal environment.27Go This is well corroborated with translocation of DYZ1 on chromosome 10 in PC1. Compared with the normal males, DYZ1 seems to be affected in all the abnormal genomes. It does not transcribe but is propagated from generation to generation across the cell lineages. This seems to play a critical role, possibly in chromatin folding and maintenance of the structural integrity of the Y chromosome. This inference is based on the fact that DYZ1 arrays showed three discernible deletions in seven different RA samples but not in any of the normal males. Deletions detected in the present study by PCR and supported by FISH data seem to have contributed towards the vulnerability of the Y chromosome, obstructing the sustenance of the pregnancy. This is because all the RA samples were of the male origin. In this context, female aborted fetus may be analyzed to include/exclude such possibility. Owing to small sample size statistical analysis was not conducted. This issue may be resolved unequivocally with the analysis of more number of samples.

Deletions within the DYZ1 region in the semen samples of NBR exposed males indicated that despite being a slow process, NBR causes genome instability. This is faithfully recorded by the DYZ1 arrays as substantiated by FISH results. CNV of DYZ1 may also be caused due to non-disjunction, large duplications and deletions.28Go–30Go Besides duplication, reverse transcriptase activity may also contribute to copy number variation.31Go Irrespective of the mechanisms involved, environment seems to contribute to genomic instability of DYZ1, thereby, supporting the concept of rapid rate of evolution of the Y chromosome.32Go Despite evidence (albeit in direct) that genomic instability of the DYZ1 is correlated with RA, we wish to refrain from any such conclusion, since work is underway on this using more number of samples to prove this point or otherwise. The abnormal copies of the DYZ1 in patients with PC have never been reported earlier. Once again, it is difficult to draw a major conclusion owing to study based on two samples. This warrants analysis of more number of PC samples to resolve this issue.


    5. Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
DYZ1 seems to be affected in RA, PC and NBR samples though its diagnostic potential has neither been explored nor acknowledged. The most intriguing observation was well-defined deletions in three different regions of DYZ1 repeat in RA samples. In addition, its copy number fluctuation below or above the normal range correlated with abnormal genotype. Present study indicates its diagnostic and prognostic potentials suggesting that this approach may be used as a marker system for ascertaining its copy number status and establishing genotype/phenotype correlation in routine clinical cases.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The work was supported by a DBT grant no BT/PR2225/Med/13/077/2000 and DST grant no SP/SO/DO3/99) to S.A. and a core grant from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India to National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi. We thank Dr Mala Arora and Dr Narinder Pal for RA samples and Shri Khem Singh Negi for technical assistance. Equipment donation from the Alexander Von Humboldt Foundation, Bonn, Germany, is gratefully acknowledged.


    Footnotes
 
*To whom correspondence ahould be addressed. Tel. +91-11-2670-3753. Fax. +91-11-2616-2125. E-mail: sheralib5{at}hotmail.com

Communicated by Minoru Ko


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Materials and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 5. Conclusion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Harris, P., Boyd, E., Young, B. D., Ferguson-Smith, M.A. 1986, Determination of the DNA content of human chromosomes by flow cytometry, Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 41, 14–21.[ISI][Medline]
  2. Morton, N. E. 1991, Parameters of the human genome, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 7474–7476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Skaletsky, H., Kuroda-Kawaguchi, T., Minx, P. J., et al. 2003, The male-specific region of the human Y chromosome is a mosaic of discrete sequence classes, Nature, 423, 825–837.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Rozen, S., Skaletsky, H., Marszalek, J. D., et al. 2003, Abundant gene conversion between arms of palindromes in human and ape Y chromosomes, Nature, 423, 810–813.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Graves, J. A. 2006, Sex chromosome specialization and degeneration in mammals, Cell, 10, 901–914.
  6. Ali, S. and Hasnain, S. E. 2002, Molecular dissection of the human Y chromosome, Gene, 283, 1–10.[ISI][Medline]
  7. Ali, S. and Hasnain, S. E. 2003, Genomics of the human Y-chromosome: association with male infertility, Gene, 321, 25–37.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Sinclair, A. H., Berta, P., Palmer, M. S., et al. 1990, A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif, Nature, 346, 240–244.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lahn, B. T. and Page, D. C. 1997, Functional coherence of the human Y chromosome, Science, 278, 675–680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Tilford, C. A., Kuroda-Kawaguchi, T., Skaletsky, H., et al. 2001, A physical map of the human Y chromosome, Nature, 409, 943–945.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Vollrath, D., Foote, S., Hilton, A., et al. 1992, The human Y chromosome: a 43-interval map based on naturally occurring deletions, Science, 258, 52–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Cooke, H. 1976, Repeated sequences specific to human males, Nature, 262, 182–186.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Nakahori, Y., Mitani, K., Yamada, M., Nakagome, Y. 1986, A human Y chromosome specific repeated DNA family (DYZ1) consists of a tandem array of pentanucleotides, Nucleic Acids. Res., 14, 7569–7580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bashamboo, A., Harleen, M. G., Azfer, M. A., Ali, S. 2003, Genomics of the human Y chromosome and molecular diagnosis, Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., 69, 525–538.
  15. Ali, S. and Gauri, B. S. 1992, A synthetic oligo nucleotide probe (5'TTCCA3') uncovers male specific hybridization pattern in the human genome, Mol. Cell. Probes, 6, 521–525.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  16. Bashamboo, A., Bhatnagar, S., Kaur, A., Sarhadi, V. K., Singh, J. R., Ali, S. 2003, Molecular characterization of a Y- derived marker chromosome and identification of indels in the DYS1 region in a patient with stigmata of Turner syndrome, Curr. Sci., 84, 219–224.
  17. Rahman, M. M., Bashamboo, A., Prasad, A., Pathak, D., Ali, S. 2004, Organizational variation of DYZ1 repeat sequences on the human Y chromosome and its diagnostic potentials, DNA Cell Biol., 23, 561–571.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Bashamboo, A., Rahman, M. M., Prasad, A., Chandy, S. P., Ahmad, J., Ali, S. 2005, Fate of SRY, PABY, DYS1, DYZ3 and DYZ1 loci in Indian patients harbouring sex chromosomal anomalies, Mol. Hum. Reprod., 11, 117–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Dasari, V. K., Deng, D., Perinchery, G., Yeh, C.C., Dahiya, R. 2002, DNA methylation regulates the expression of Y chromosome specific genes in prostate cancer, J. Urol., 167, 335–338.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Paracchini, S., Pearce, C. L., Kolonel, L. N., Altshuler, D., Henderson, B. E., Tyler-smith, C. 2003, A Y chromosomal influence on prostate cancer risk: the multi-ethnic cohort study, J. Med. Genet., 40, 815–819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Premi, S., Srivastava, J., Chandy, S. P., Ahmad, J., Ali, S. 2006, Tandem duplication and copy number polymorphism of the SRY gene in patients with sex chromosome anomalies and males exposed to natural background radiation, Mol. Hum. Reprod., 12, 113–121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ali, S., Muller, C. R., Epplen, J. T. 1986, DNA fingerprinting by oligonucleotides probes specific for simple repeats, Hum. Genet., 74, 239–243.[ISI][Medline]
  23. Chattopadhyay, M., Gangadharan, S., Kapur, V., Azfer, A. A., Prakash, B., Ali, S. 2001, Satellite - tagged transcribing sequences in Bubalus bubalis genome undergo programmed modulation in meiocytes: possible implications for transcriptional inactivation, DNA Cell Biol., 20, 587–503.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Smith, G. P. 1976, Evolution of repeated DNA sequences by unequal cross over, Science, 191, 528–535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Jeffreys, A. J., Wilson, V., Thein, S. L. 1985, Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA, Biotechnology, 24, 467–472.
  26. Nakamura, Y., Lathrop, M., Oconnell, P., et al. 1988, A map set of DNA markers for human chromosome 17, Genomics, 2, 302–309.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Buckle, V. J., Edwards, J. H., Evans, E. P., et al. 1984, Chromosome maps of man and mouse II, Clin. Genet., 26, 1–11.[Medline]
  28. Locke, D. P., Archidiacono, N., Misceo, D., et al. 2003, Refinement of a chimpanzee pericentric inversion breakpoint to a segmental duplication cluster, Genome Biol., 4, R50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Frazer, K. A., Chen, X., Hinds, D. A., Pant, P. V., Patil, N., Cox, D. R. 2003, Genomic DNA insertions and deletions occur frequently between humans and nonhuman primates, Genome Res., 13, 341–346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Liu, G., Zhao, S., Bailey, J. A., et al. 2003, Analysis of primate genomic variation reveals a repeat-driven expansion of the human genome, Genome Res., 13, 358–368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Moran, J. V., Holmes, S. E., Naas, T. P., DeBerardinis, R. J., Boeke, J. D., Kazaarian, H. H. Jr. 1996, High frequency retransposition in cultured mammalian cells, Cell, 29, 917–927.
  32. Lahn, B.T., Pearson, N. M., Jegalian, K. 2001, The human Y chromosome, in the light of evolution, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2, 207–216.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
13/3/103    most recent
dsl002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pathak, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?