DNA Research Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2006
DNA Research 2005 12(5):269-280; doi:10.1093/dnares/dsi016
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genome-Wide Survey of Transcription Factors in Prokaryotes Reveals Many Bacteria-Specific Families Not Found in Archaea
1Laboratory of Gene-Product Informatics, Center for Information BiologyDNA Data Bank of Japan, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems 1111 Yata, Mishima, Shizuoka, 411-8540 Japan
2Japan Science and Technology Corporation 18, Honcho 4-chome, Kawaguchi City, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan
Assignment of all transcription factors (TFs) from genome sequence data is not a straightforward task due to the wide variation in TFs among different species. A DNA binding domain (DBD) and a contiguous non-DBD with a characteristic SCOP or Pfam domain combination are observed in most members of TF families. We found that most of the experimentally verified TFs in prokaryotes are detectable by a combination of SCOP or Pfam domains assigned to DBDs and non-DBDs. Based on this finding, we set up rules to detect TFs and classify them into 52 TF families. Application of the rules to 154 entirely sequenced prokaryotic genomes detected >18 000 TFs classified into families, which have been made publicly available from the GTOP_TF database. Despite the rough proportionality of the number of TFs per genome with genome size, species with reduced genomes, i.e. obligatory parasites and symbionts, have only a few if any TFs, reflecting a nearly complete loss. Also the number of TFs is significantly lower in archaea than in bacteria. In addition, all but 1 of the 19 TF families present in archaea is present in bacteria, whereas 33 TF families are found exclusively in bacteria. This observation indicates that a number of new TF families have evolved in bacteria, making the transcription regulatory system more divergent in bacteria than in archaea.
Key words: transcription factor; domain organization; DNA binding; prokaryote; comparative genomics
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel. +81-55-981-6859, Fax. +81-55-981-6889, E-mail: knishika{at}genes.nig.ac.jp
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kaneko, N. Nakajima, S. Okamoto, I. Suzuki, Y. Tanabe, M. Tamaoki, Y. Nakamura, F. Kasai, A. Watanabe, K. Kawashima, et al. Complete Genomic Structure of the Bloom-forming Toxic Cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843 DNA Res, January 11, 2008; (2008) dsm026v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ren, S. Sainsbury, S. E. Combs, R. G. Capper, P. W. Jordan, N. S. Berrow, D. K. Stammers, N. J. Saunders, and R. J. Owens The Structure and Transcriptional Analysis of a Global Regulator from Neisseria meningitidis J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14655 - 14664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, P. Mukhopadhyay, M. J. Wood, F. W. Outten, J. A. Opdyke, and G. Storz Mutational Analysis To Define an Activating Region on the Redox-Sensitive Transcriptional Regulator OxyR J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2006; 188(24): 8335 - 8342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


